Home Forums The Japanese Language Expressiveness in Japanese

This topic contains 5 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  vanandrew 11 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #40347

    thisiskyle
    Member

    Comrades,

    I was flipping around on Amazon the other day and saw this book and am thinking about buying it.  The book reminded me of a conversation I had with my old neighbor about what I will call “near-synonyms”: words that have the same basic meaning but vary in degree or nuance. I noticed that Japanese people (at least those with which I’d interacted to any extent) tended to use a very limited set of adjectives. Almost everything was 「おもしろい!」. I think many people learning Japanese tend to get this impression, that the Japanese language (at least as it is used today) is not very expressive.

    I’ll be the first to admit that, in English (especially American English), people have a tendency to go to the opposite extreme; bordering (and often plunging into) hyperbole. How “awesome” can a sandwich really be? But I’ve always felt stilted when using Japanese due to the lack of ability to differentiate between things that are big, huge, monstrous and  gargantuan.

    I’m curious about your experiences with this type of thing.

     

    #40354

    Joel
    Member

    I tend to use a limited set of adjectives in Japanese because I just can’t plain think of any others on the run. =P

    That said, I’m not really any fount of adjectives in English either… and I’m not sure if a great deal get used around me either, though I haven’t really been counting. Maybe I should pay attention to it. =)

    #40406

    vanandrew
    Member

    I saw a figure quoted once about the number of adjective in each language, apparently English had way more, allowing for greater expressiveness. Allegedly.

     

    #40408

    Joel
    Member

    The number that exist in the dictionary, or the number that get used in a typical conversation?

    #40409

    vanandrew
    Member

    Good point, I don’t recall.

    #40410

    vanandrew
    Member

    I assume they meant in existence, in dictionaries.

     

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.