Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sentance Confirmation #49419

    Brook
    Member

    I humbly suggest that Joel misread. I don’t think this is correct.

    Let me try to make this clear for you.

    ボビーさん   すし を たべます。
    Bobby will eat sushi.
    … would be the answer to…
    ボビーさん  なに を たべますか?
    What will Bobby eat?

    ボビーさん    すし を たべます。
    Bobby will eat sushi.
    … would be the answer to…
    すし を だれ たべますか?
    Who will eat sushi?

    First case : you don’t need to emphasize ボビーさん, because the person who asked the question introduced him as the topic using が. What’s important in your reply is the part that actually gives the person the information they want (i.e. that すし is what Bobby will eat). That’s what I guess Koichi means when he says that は emphasizes what comes after.

    Second case : the person who asked the question didn’t introduce any topic. A topic is something that is defined and “who” is, in essence, undefined. Besides, Bobby wasn’t mentioned. So you will have to use が to introduce ボビーさん as the topic of your reply. This time, the important part of your answer comes before the particle. They know sushi will be eaten, what they want to know is by whom. That would be ボビーさん.

    So, as for your example, there are two possible situations:

    -These people weren’t talking about food before.
    The person who asks the question has to use が to introduce たべもの as the topic. Once it’s done and until the topic changes, が won’t be needed anymore for たべもの. So は should be used in the answer (and the following sentences).

    -These people were already talking about food.
    Since they were already talking about it, たべもの is clearly the topic. が is not needed – it might have been used sooner in the conversation, though – and both persons should use は.

    Joel is obviously welcome to correct me if I said anything wrong.

    パンツ見せて貰ってもよろしいですか。
    in reply to: オレンジ #49401

    Brook
    Member

    Thanks.

    パンツ見せて貰ってもよろしいですか。
    in reply to: Do we need to learn on'yomi? #49373

    Brook
    Member

    Well, as the name implies, on’yomi reading is how the kanji is supposed to be read (in a sizeable amount of situations). So, unless you’re trying to learn Japanese without actually learning how to read Japanese (which would be bold since 99% of the learning material is text), yes, you have to learn them.

    You shouldn’t memorize all of the readings in one go, though. As Koichi advises in his course, you should rather learn the most common reading(s) first and the other ones “in the long run”. But I don’t think you will get to said long run with zero knowledge of on’yomi readings and even if you do, that’ll just be more things to learn when you get there. So I’d suggest you follow Koichi’s advice.

    I don’t know anything about Wanikani’s SRS, but if the algorithm is any good, you should quickly get to a point where it’s not annoyingly easy anymore.

    As for tips, Textfugu’s mnemonics are pretty good. Better than I thought they would be, actually. Besides that, the secret is that there is no secret: work is what gets you somewhere.

    Cheers!

    パンツ見せて貰ってもよろしいですか。
    in reply to: My two cents about 「は」 (and how it's explained). #49364

    Brook
    Member

    I found stative verbs and dynamic verbs (sometimes referred to as “action verbs”). Verbe d’état and verbe d’action in French. See? Told you. Cousins. The verbe d’état group is much more restrictive, though.
    And they seem to be quite official in both languages, since they follow common rules.
    If only I hated litteral translation a little bit less… I could have googled “state verb”, and I wouldn’t feel as dumb as I feel right now. :)
    As for Japanese, Wikipedia indicates a list of five classes with “other possible classes, and a large amount of overlap between the classes”. This is going to be fun. :)

    パンツ見せて貰ってもよろしいですか。
    in reply to: My two cents about 「は」 (and how it's explained). #49361

    Brook
    Member

    Nope. You nailed it. It’s quite clear when you use a sentence where the topic and the subject are distinct, and it might actually help me when I get to が.

    Concerning です, I was thinking of a concept in French grammar that kind of includes copula (which is one I didn’t know of), and for which I couldn’t find an English equivalent, let alone a Japanese one. Basically, this concept groups “to be” with verbs like “to seem”, “”to appear”, “to remain”, “to become”… But now I see that this is not what we have here.

    3くジョエルせんぱい。

    パンツ見せて貰ってもよろしいですか。
    in reply to: Hi from France. #49356

    Brook
    Member

    Well, getting good enough not to need subtitles when you watch a show is one thing… Mastering the language or even feeling comfortable enough with it to fluenty express complex thoughts is another story. And, as you probably figured (unless I got very lucky and got everything right), I can’t tell that story.

    But, as you may know, English, at some point in time, borrowed a lot of words from old French, and French, in turn, started borrowing more and more English words, and it keeps going as we speak. Not to mention all the words that have a common latin root. Also, the basic grammars are similar in many ways. So it’s really not that hard for a French self-student who showed the least bit of interest for English in the past to feel, if not at home, at least at a distant cousin’s place, when watching an English-language show, and to make great progress with a minimal amount of work in the first few months of learning. And then they’d stop making progress, because TV show English is quite low-level, I recently realized. And that’s where I stand. :)

    Now, Japanese… That’s a whole other world, and I wasn’t going to get anywhere any time soon on my own. But things are going pretty smoothly so far, so I really think joining was the right move.

    パンツ見せて貰ってもよろしいですか。
Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)